- an injunction to prevent publication;
- damages after publication;
An offer of amends can be made as a means of early resolution, without recourse to a court settled dispute, and so has been dealt with as a separate area.
Injunction before Publication
An injunction before publication is difficult to obtain. It will not be given where the party who intends to publish the material indicates that it will justify the defamation, that is, can establish a defence for the assertions which are made and that it is for the public benefit that they be published. An applicant must demonstrate sufficient seriousness not definite harm. A court will consider the interests involved in granting or denying an application for an injunction.
Unless there is a real likelihood that the material will be further and more widely disseminated, an injunction after publication is virtually useless as a remedy. The damage has already been done.
The Defamation Act sets out several rules in relation to damages. Damages awarded must bear a rational relationship to the harm. This is a matter for the court to decide, and so far there are no Tasmanian authorities on what this section means. The damages for non-economic loss are limited, so unquantifiable harms are not able to be compensated.
This also means that exemplary or punitive damages cannot be awarded. Exemplary or punitive damages were traditionally used to discourage defendants from engaging in similar conduct in the future. The uniform defamation legislation abolishes this practice.
As to damages for non-economic loss, this concerns things such as mental harm, or pain and suffering. The maximum damages amount in Tasmania is $250,000, an amount that is indexed from time to time according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. A court may still order aggravated damages beyond maximum damages amount if the court is satisfied that the circumstances of the publication warrant such an award.
Mitigatory factors in relation to damages include that the defendant has made an apology, or they have published a correction. An example of a mitigatory factor is where a newspaper publishes a correction as soon as possible after the alleged defamatory imputation was made.
It is also a mitigatory factor where another publication has published matter having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter before the court and the plaintiff has already recovered damages, or begun an action for that purpose, or received or agreed to or received compensation. The court can take other matters into account in mitigating damages and is not limited by section 38.
Page last updated 28/02/2022